Tag: learning

AAD Security Teams, & saving personal views

Previously I’ve touched on how it’s possible to use Azure Active Directory for Dynamics 365 security. This can be of great benefit to an organisation, especially when needing to invite in external users. The details that I go into around it can be found at Dynamics 365 Security & AAD. As I point out there, it’s a very helpful feature, and can also help with onboarding new users within an organisation.

What I’ve found out about it, however, is that there can be some very interesting little quirks with how security actually works. Originally I thought it was a bug, and raised it with Microsoft Support, but it turns out not to be. Let me take you through the journey that I experienced last week…

The scenario is as follows. We had security set up in place, which was working perfectly (or so we thought). We’d gone through all of the following steps:

  1. Create Dynamics 365 security role/s with appropriate permissions
  2. Create AAD security group
  3. Create Dynamics 365 AAD Security Team, and link it to the AAD security group
  4. Assign users to the AAD security group

This was working exceptionally well (except, of course, when the external users hadn’t followed the setup instructions correctly). Users were logging in, searching for information, creating/updating records, etc. All was good…or so we thought.

Now, the users who are actually using the application don’t have a Dynamics 365 background. It’s the first time that they’re using the specific system, and as such, are going through a learning curve. We’re not expecting them to understand the advanced functionality at this point, though some of them are indeed venturing further/deeper into the capabilities that it brings.

The Learning Curve | Listen via Stitcher for Podcasts

One of these, of course, is the Advanced Find. Now, those experienced with Dynamics 365 will know all about it. There are good points, and there are not so good points. Functionality in it has expanded over time, though to be honest it’s still easier to run a SQL query/extract for more advanced information retrieval.

Users seemed to be fine with the Advanced Find. We showed them how it works, how to filter, set up columns, etc. We even showed them how to export data to Excel, and keep a live data connection back to refresh it! Brilliant – they were most pleased.

Then I got an email in from a user needing support. They reported that they weren’t able to save custom searches. This is of course very helpful, in order to avoid having to set up the same search/layout every time. This seemed puzzling to me, and I started to take a look into it.

Always download the error log file – it can be SO useful!

I was able to replicate the problem immediately with a test user, having assigned it the same security role. Opening the log file (which can be extremely helpful at times with troubleshooting), I looked to see what the issues were. I was thinking it was a problem with security permissions – if I assigned the system administrator role to my user, everything worked just fine.

Incidentally, there’s a really good blog post at https://www.powerobjects.com/blog/2015/02/13/access-denied-identify-fix-security-role-issue/ which covers troubleshooting security role issues. I’ve used it on several occasions previously.

In my error log, there were repeated references to ‘ObjectTypeCode”:4230’. This is the View settings in the security role. I therefore went to the security role, and ensured that it was set to allow access to Saved View across all permissions:

It’s only possible to set User-level permissions for Saved Views

Right – permissions set, all should be good. Let’s go ahead & try to save an Advanced Find as a view…but no! It’s still not working, and showing the same error message!

What I then tried to do was apply the security role directly to the user, rather than through the AAD security team. To my surprise (well, not really, actually), it worked. I was able to save Advanced Find views. I changed back to the user getting permissions through the security group (ie not directly), and again I had the issue.

OK – so I thought I had discovered a bug. As far as I was aware, I couldn’t see any reason why the user wouldn’t be able to save the Advanced Find view. After all, they’re able to create & save records within the system. There surely shouldn’t be any difference between saving records, and saving an Advanced Find view?

Stressful woman looks with puzzled expression into screen, wears formal shirt, busy with making financial report, feels worried about deadlines, feels headache from recieving bad news Premium Photo

My next step was to raise a support ticket with Microsoft, and then carry out the obligatory ‘show & tell’ to the support agent. Ivan (the agent assigned to my case) was very helpful, understood exactly what I was trying to accomplish, and what the issue seemed to be. I left him with the support case, and focused on trying to find a workaround for the situation.

After a few days, Ivan came back to me with a resolution. It wasn’t a bug in the system (which was a shame – I was looking forward to having it attributed to me!), but rather a specific case of permissions.

See, there’s something called ‘privilege inheritance’. In a nutshell, there are two ways of giving access through a security role:

  1. User privileges. This is when the user is given the permissions directly
  2. Team privileges. This is when the user is given the permissions as a member of the team. If they don’t have User privileges of their own, they can only create records with the team as the owner

There’s a good article on this at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/power-platform/admin/security-roles-privileges#team-members-privilege-inheritance

So what was actually happening was as follows:

  • Users were able to read, create, update records without issues, as the team was the owner of these records
  • However as views need to be owned by a user (though they can be shared with a team), the user was unable to save them!

Thankfully it’s quite easy to fix – on the security role itself, you change it here:

With this then in place, everything then worked just fine. The user was still getting the role through the Security Team, but was now able to save these directly.

Quite an interesting little quirk, but one that is likely to come in useful when looking at other functionality within the system.

Have you come across this before? Have you found anything else that seems a little strange? Comment below – I’d love to hear!

Power Automate & Lookup Fields

Recently I’ve been expanding my knowledge of Power Automate, and how it works. It really is a truly amazing tool, though there can be some quirks to things! There are so many connectors to use, though I haven’t really used that many of them to date.

Truthfully, most of my work in Power Automate is around CDS & Office 365. Occasionally I’ll dip into another system, but for the most part that keeps me busy enough. It’s not to say I don’t want to explore further, but finding the time can be quite difficult!

One of the great abilities that Power Automate has is to be able to update a record. With focusing on CDS entities for the moment, we would use the inbuilt action for this:

We’d run a query to get a specific record – this would give us the record ID (or GUID, depending on your preference). With this, we’d use the Update Record action & pass in the record GUID. After all, we need to know which record we’re going to update! So for example:

What we can then do is set values for the record. So we can pass in Dynamics Content, use Expressions, etc. These can be from records that are part of our Power Automate query chain, or from elsewhere.

For example, I can say that when a contact’s postcode changes (or zip code for USA), go away, look up the new city, and update it (Note: I haven’t shown the postcode lookup part below):

So this is all really brilliant. Different fields have different behaviours, of course, and we need to respect that. Otherwise the Power Automate flow won’t run, and will error. This is, of course, the digital equivalent of not trying to force a square brick into a round hole!

What we can also do is clear a field value. If for example we’re wanting to remove a value from a field, we can use the NULL expression on the field. When the Power Automate flow runs, it’ll clear whichever value the field is currently holding:

Now, one of the the field types available within CDS is the lookup field. I’m not going to go into what this is, as we should already know this!. We can, of course, set lookup fields values to populate the field, which works as expected.

However (& thanks for bearing with me so far), what happens if we want to clear a lookup field value?

Say for example that we have a task, that’s assigned out to someone. If they reject the task, we want to be able to remove them from the task record. We wouldn’t delete the task, as we still need it (& now would need to assign it to someone else). We need a way to do this.

I can hear what you’re thinking right now – mentioned above is the use of NULL, so we’d use this! Um…well, you’d think so. You can try that, but we’ve found that doesn’t always work. Additionally, that doesn’t actually seem to remove the underlying relationship that’s been put in place.

Update: Thanks to Lin Zaw Winn, who dropped me a line to let me know further information around this. The standard CDS connector (the first one that was available) allowed this to work, but the updated CDS connector (Current Environment) doesn’t allow it. Unfortunately the different connectors aren’t at parity, which is a pity!

So, there’s another way to clear lookup field values. This involves the Unrelate action that’s also available. The steps for this are as follows:

  1. Get the related record (lookup the record type, pass in the GUID for it)
  2. Use the Unrelate action to remove the connection

This will then remove the relationship, which actually results in clearing the lookup field value. In practise (for our scenario), this would look like:

Let’s take a bit of a further look at the options available here:

  • The Relationship field is the relationship between the two entities (eg here it’s Contact & Task). Thankfully you don’t need to manually type this – it’s easily selected from a dropdown list.
  • The URL field is the linked record itself

Note: It’s VERY important to have the Entity Name & URL values in the right order. I’d suggest looking up the connected record first (ie what the lookup field is pointing to), and using that as the Entity Name value. You’d then select the record where the lookup is saved on as the URL value.

What I’d usually suggest as best practise is to have a condition before this takes place. As mentioned earlier, removing the lookup would happen on a record update. This is because you wouldn’t be removing a field value if you’re creating the record!

But you’re not always going to want it removed. In the scenario that I’ve been dealing with, we’re only wanting to remove the volunteer if they’ve rejected the assigned task. So our Power Automate flow is set out like this:

  • When Task record is updated
    • Filtering on the field for ‘Task Accepted’, as we could have other things being updated on the Task record that we don’t want to trigger this particular process
  • Condition to check the ‘Task Accepted’ field value
    • When it’s something other than ‘Rejected’, cancel the flow
    • When it’s ‘Rejected’, run the Unrelate process set out above, and stop flow

You can obviously build out other functionality within it as you so desire.

So with this in mind, how do you think you could benefit from this? Drop a comment below – I’d love to hear!

Dynamics 365 Security & AAD

I come from an ‘on-premise’ background. I’ve spent years in organisations with on-premise systems such as Dynamics 365. Take me into a server room that’s alive with whirring fans, and I get quite nostalgic. Those were the days…well, in some ways, anyhow. But having recently discovered some quite helpful functionality, I thought I’d share it with others!

See, when it came to Dynamics 365 security, there was no way to automate things. Yes, users had to be created in Active Directory (and also, in a folder that the Dynamics install could refer to within AD!), but they had to be manually added to Dynamics 365. There was no way to automate this (from recollection – then again my memory grows dim with the fog of time).

So what the system administrators needed to do was to manually go to Settings/Security within the system, and there they could either add a single user at a time, or multiple users. They would then assign role/s (for multiple users, all of the users would need to have the same role/s – it wasn’t possible to modify individual users within this process).

One way to slightly speed up time in handling different security roles was to have teams, relating to the business needs. The security role/s would be created, assigned to a team, and then any user added to the team would automatically get all of the permissions that they needed.

Then came the heady world of Dynamics 365 being online! Well, nothing much changed really, at least not for a little while.

But then, things really did change, in May 2019. Functionality for security teams within Dynamics 365 was increased. Notably, there was now something called a ‘AAD Security Group Team’:

So what was this magical new item?

When we create a team, and we set the Team Type to ‘AAD Security Group’, we’re now able to set an AAD Object ID. In fact, it’s required! After we’ve created this object within Dynamics 365, we can then apply security role/s to it directly (as we could to any other team records beforehand):

Let’s take a moment to reflect & think on this. Until now, we’ve had to handle security directly within Dynamics 365. Now, we have the ability to have an Azure Active Directory (for that is what AAD stands for) group, and reference it within Dynamics 365.

Suddenly new possibilities open up. As part of the on-boarding process (for example) we can users to specific AAD security groups, which will then give them access with appropriate permissions within Dynamics 365. We’re also able to have multiple AAD groups, each inheriting a different set of Dynamics 365 roles, and thereby create a multi-layering approach to different business & security needs.

We’re also able to use tools such as PowerShell, LogicApps, Power Apps & Power Automate to carry out automation around this. There’s an Azure AD connector (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/connectors/azuread/) which gives the ability to set up & administer these.

We’re actually using this functionality now in some of our COVID-19 response apps. Instead of needing our own support desk to manage the (external) users, we’ve provided an interface where client IT departments can quickly log in, upload a list of users, and assign them to the relevant AAD group/s. It’s very quick, and allows the users to onboard to the Power Apps within minutes!

So with knowing this, how do you feel it might help benefit you? Comment below – I’d love to hear!

Omnichannel Macros

I’ve previously touched on macros in https://thecrm.ninja/omnichannel-productivity-tools/, but with some new functionality that’s now come out, I thought it would be quite interesting to dive deeper in them. By doing do, we can see how they work, the functionality that they offer, and some really cool & interesting scenarios!

Let’s have a quick reminder of what macros are all about (for those who don’t know, yet):

Macros allow customer service agents to carry out repetitive tasks that can span multiple entities. Eg opening forms (model-driven apps), pre-populating data into the form, etc. Through this, not only are there less manual tasks/steps to carry out, there’s now the ability to carry out the same tasks, without worrying about a step being missed, or the wrong data copied in, etc.

With that in mind, let’s see what there is for macros in Omnichannel. As a default, there were always the following 3 pre-defined automation actions:

With these, we’re able to do things like:

  • Opening a form to create a new record. This could be used to create a new contact automatically
  • Opening an existing record. This could be used to open an existing contact (based on pre-survey questions, such as email address etc
  • Searching the Knowledge Base using specified keywords/phrases
  • Opening an email form with a pre-defined templated
  • Linking records together

There’s now a new option available:

Hmm. This looks interesting. What happens when we select it?

We get a condition block! Clicking ‘Add an action’ will allow us to then add either one of the pre-defined automation actions, or another Control/Condition block.

OK – so you’re now thinking that I’m getting over excited about this. But hold on – let me explain further why I’m really liking this.

So when using Power Automate, frequently I’ll use condition blocks to check/satisfy things (it’s obviously available in Logic Apps as well, but I have minimal experience of those to date). Some of them can get quite advanced, but it comes in useful. However for Omnichannel macros to date, it’s not been possible to do this. We’ve been limited to just a few options, without being able to specify branching criteria based on variables.

Now we’re (finally) able to do this. The Condition field works in the same way as Power Automate does, with being able to string multiple statements together, and have actions that result from them. We’re also able to use slugs in them, to populate variables & use customer-entered data.

Let’s see an example of this. We have a customer who’s opening an Omnichannel chat session. They’ve filled in the pre-survey questions, in which we’ve asked for the following pieces of information:

  • First Name (required)
  • Last Name (required)
  • Email Address (required)
  • Company Name

With the condition check in place, we can either create just a contact record (if the customer didn’t fill in the company name field), or we can create both account & contact records, and link the two together. We could also check if the customer already exists as a contact, and then not need to create any records for them.

This means that there will be much less manual work for the agent to carry out, as they won’t have to manually create all of these records.

We’re able to string these together in ‘multi’ step scenarios, to allow things to flow on from each other:

There are also other options available to use, such as the ability to clone, and the ability to open a new application tab. I’ve covered application tabs at https://thecrm.ninja/omnichannel-application-tabs/, so we can see how helpful this could actually be. We wouldn’t need to automatically open a specific system for all customers contacting us; instead we’re able to selectively open things based on the actual customer. This makes for a much cleaner & better agent experience, in my opinion.

In summary, this is a really helpful & useful feature that’s been added, bringing even better functionality to macros. We’ve been able to do these sorts of things elsewhere to date, and being able to do it here now as well is great. All I can say is that I’m wondering what else we could do…perhaps kick off a Power Automate Flow as well? We’ll have to wait and see 🙂

Omnichannel & Application Tabs

One of the really nice things about the Omnichannel Agent experience is that it uses tabs. The conversation itself is in the left side of the screen, with the Customer Summary open in the right side of the screen. However this isn’t fixed into place – it’s possible to open additional tabs next tot he Customer Summary tab, and navigate to various places in the system.

This allows agents to easily look up additional information on records such as contacts & cases, as well as other places.

Agents are therefore able to quickly flip between different system records, getting the information that they may need to satisfy the customer interaction.

So that’s great. Clicking the + icon on the tab allows new tabs to be opened, and the agent can select which record type they’d like to see:

The system allows movement between these if they disappear off the screen with arrow buttons being available:

So all of this is really good, and is provided as system default behaviour, without any customisation or configuration being needed to be done.

So let’s now think about several other types of scenarios, and see what could be done to enable them:

  • You want the agent to see a dashboard showing how long the production line is currently taking with different order types
  • You want to be able to look up an item in another stock system
  • You want to carry out a custom search in your distributor network

All of the above items (and many more) are things that aren’t native within Dynamics 365. It’s therefore not possible to display this with native system functionality…or is it?

Well, it is! Omnichannel has something called ‘Application Tab Templates’. These allow you to specify custom tabs to open when a chat start. With these, you’re able to point to any web-based resource, even if it’s not within Dynamics 365!

Note: It’s not possible to point to a bespoke desktop application using Application Tab Templates. The resource that you’re wanting to point to needs to be web-based. This is one of the main differentiators between Omnichannel & Unified Service Desk – USD allows you to point to a desktop/server application within the window.

Setting up a new Application Tab Template is not too difficult, thankfully:

We’re able to select what the Application Type should be. There are various options here, including web resources, ‘third party’ websites, entity lists, etc:

When we save the record, we can then input the necessary parameters for that type. These parameters are system-defined, so we have to work within these, and can’t add any additional ones (at this point in time). We can also use values from pre-chat surveys based on information that the customer has provided before the chat starts. Imagine being an agent with a new conversation, and you already have the entire purchase history for them open, or their billing records!

Note: For a full listing of the parameters available for each application type, please refer to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/omnichannel/administrator/application-tab-templates#application-types

Once this has been created, the next step is to associate it with a session template. Session templates govern the following items:

  • The behaviour of the chat by default (Docked, Minimized or Hidden
  • The name of the session
  • The application tab/s that open (you can add as many as you want to)
  • The agent scripts that are available to be used.

To do this, open the relevant session template, and then add the application tab/s to it that you want to appear:

Save & close the session template record, and refresh the agent interface. When a new chat session comes in, Hey Presto!

Using the ability to have different chat widgets, it’s possible to customise each one in a different way. So for example:

  • The Sales team could have the distributor system open, to know how long it’ll take to fulfil an order
  • The Billing team could have their invoice/finance system open, to have the customer billing history
  • The Motorbike Servicing team could have their system which tracks all work done on your motorbike open, to see the entire service history

It’s really up to you how you choose to best make use of this. I feel it’s really quite helpful, and will cut down on the time that agents need to spend to pull up different pieces of information to help the customer.

How do you think you would use it in your company? Comment below to share 🙂

Omnichannel & Sentiment Analysis (II)

I’ve previously touched upon sentiment analysis within Omnichannel in several articles (https://thecrm.ninja/omnichannel-sentiment-analysis/ and https://thecrm.ninja/omnichannel-supervisor-tools/). It’s really a great feature that allows agents to quickly & easily see how the customer is interacting. It also allows for supervisors to see at a glance how interactions are going overall.

With all of that, I thought it would be helpful to take a further look into how sentiment analysis actually works, so that we can understand it a little better.

Now, the actual nuts & bolts for sentiment analysis are provided by Azure Cognitive Services. There are a wide range of tools available through this, but we have no need to go into Azure to configure this. It’s a simple setting within Omnichannel to get it working, rather than needing to fiddle around with many different things:

However, what’s actually going on during a conversation, and how is the sentiment analysis worked out/calculated? We see the pretty little face icons (with the different colours), but how are these actually being set?

Well, there are two ways in which algorithms are used to calculate the sentiment that’s shown:

  • Natural language processing (NLP)
  • Machine learning (ML) algorithms

With these two ways methods, it’s possible to not only see what the current interactions are showing, but also to enhance the model to understand sentiment better.

Note: In a session that I presented recently, one of the attendees asked if it’s possible to train the model, to result in a custom algorithm. Unfortunately this isn’t possible to do – the machine learning that takes place is the general Azure one, rather than one for a single company or customer

The following diagram shows the sentiments that are used. They’re nicely colour-coded, for ease of reference as well:

When a customer interacts through Omnichannel, the sentiment shown is based on the last 6 messages received from the customer. As a result, the sentiment shown can very well fluctuate & change during the conversation, based on how it’s going.

The Sweetest Languages in the World - | Beyond Exclamation

Obviously, customers aren’t just going to use English to communicate. Companies are based around the world, and will use their native/local language when providing support. Omnichannel allows for this without an issue, utilising the Azure Text Translator API behind the scenes to provide this. If you’re interested to see which languages are supported for this, head to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/translator/language-support which is the latest source of information for this.

There are some interesting things to know around how this actually works:

  • When a language other than English is used, the Text Translator API translates the text to English, and then it’s analysed/scored for sentiment
  • If a language isn’t supported by the Text Translator API, it won’t be scored
  • If profanity (eg a swearword) is detected, the sentiment will automatically be shown as Negative or Very Negative, regardless of the rest of the last 6 lines of conversation

Some people have expressed their concern to me around how accurate the Azure translation actually is, but to date I haven’t seen any major concerns resulting out from it. As with the other Azure services, Microsoft is continually refining & improving it. That being said, there are several languages with very nuanced terms. I’d like to think that these would be supported without issues.

There is, however, somewhat of an interesting behaviour when starting off the analysis at the beginning of the conversation:

  • If the initial language is detected as English, it’s assumed that all of the subsequent conversation will be in English. As a result, if the customer switches away from English, the system won’t recognise this, and a Neutral sentiment score will be shown
  • If the initial conversation is not in English, then the system will check every conversation line & re-detect the language as necessary.

This seems somewhat strange to me, as I’d have thought that the system would automatically check the language for each conversation line. I can think of plenty of scenarios where different languages are used in a single conversation, even if it does start with English being used. I’d like to think that this will be updated at some point, to make the experience better.

Workflows & Managed Solutions

This is about some interesting behaviour around workflows & managed solutions, which I’ve recently discovered. Let me give a bit of background first.

Currently I’m working on several COVID-19 apps for local authorities, to be able to help them assist people in need. As part of this, each local authority has a portal within the solution. The portal itself is a Power App Portal, and I haven’t really had exposure to them before.

blog.atwork.at | Hello, PowerApps Portals (and external users)!
Default portal view, not the one we implemented!

Installing a Power Apps Portal comes with quite a large number of solutions in order to get it to work. More on this below.

Due to the way in which we’re engaging with our clients, the solutions are built in a single tenancy (different environments, of course!). We’re then inviting the users in as guests through Azure Active Directory, to be able to access functionality etc. This works well – we don’t need to worry about managing user accounts, AAD permissions, etc. However it also means that we don’t have any Office 365 licenses within the environment itself.

Now we have workflows that are sending emails out around the portal – registrations, password resets, etc. These are being generated automatically by the system, but as there’s no Office 365 mailbox for the user, they’re queuing up.

It’s not possible to authenticate a mailbox belonging to an external user (we tried!), as the system needs a native (full) user with an active mailbox to be able to send out emails. This is of course unlike Power Automate, where you can create a Send Email action and use specified credentials for logging in to send an email.

So, we did what any normal system administrator/configurator would do. We opened up the relevant (managed) solution, and from there opened up the workflow that we needed to modify. Things looked normal at first – we deactivated the workflow, and started poking around it to see what made it tick.

We came across the part that actually took user credentials to send the email that was being generated, and modified this accordingly. Then we saved the workflow, which was successful. However, upon trying to then reactivate the workflow, we got the following error message (helpful, isn’t it!):

Nicely it gives the option to download the log file around the error. This can usually be quite helpful (at times), so we thought we’d take a look at it. Behold the following (I’ve had to shrink the screenshot to allow it to fit on the screen!):

Isn’t that ‘beautiful’. Don’t worry if you can’t actually make out the error information – none of it makes any sense, at least not in a practical sort of way.

Being stuck at this, I thought to reach out to one of the community Power App Portal champions, Mario Trueba. I’ve known him for a while, and he’s just simply amazing. Having asked if I could jump on a call with him for 15 minutes to diagnose (& hopefully find an answer!), we spent almost an hour!

He suggested trying to use the classic interface, as I had been doing all of this through the new UI. So off I went to open up Classic (I’ve missed this, I will freely admit). Through there, we opened up the solution, opened up the workflow, and re-activated it. Or not, as it happens – even through the Classic UI, we weren’t able to do so. We tried a variety of things, but to no avail. It just simply wasn’t happening!

I was slightly concerned that there was an underlying issues with Portals, perhaps from some legacy CafeX code. I had tried searching with Mario for error details contained within the log file, but we couldn’t find anything that would fix it.

The next morning on waking up & checking Twitter, I noticed someone tweeting around Portals, and engaged with them. They turned out to be on the Portals development team, and told me to shoot them over an email with the details, which I did. They then replied to me, saying that it wasn’t anything specific to Portals, and that I should raise a support ticket. That crossed one item off my list (a Portals issue), but I was still needing to get things resolved.

So I went off & raised a support ticket. A few hours later, a very nice tech support person called Siva gave me a call to discuss the issue. We hopped into Teams, and in what I can only describe as the SHORTEST period of time that I’ve ever experienced, the issue was resolved (it took 7 minutes in total. Yes, I know…). Don’t worry – I’m not going to leave you hanging here!

See, what the ‘issue’ (and I’m deliberately putting it in quotes) was turned out to be something quite simple, yet quite strange.

Essentially opening the workflow from the managed solution somehow (& I don’t know HOW) inherits the ‘managed’ property. This is whether we open it from the new UI, or the classic UI. As a result we’re able to deactivate it, but we CAN’T reactivate it due to the system thinking that we’re modifying a managed component (as an aside, it is interesting how I did manage to save it though?). This was what was causing things to fall over, and the error message was really not helpful at all.

It’s also not a matter of being a Microsoft (or ISV) managed solution. I’ve replicated this happening with a solution that I’ve built, exported as managed, & then imported.

So how did we do it? Well, there are two ways in which this can be dealt with:

Either we can go to System/Processes, find the workflow there, open it up, and then reactivate it:

Or we can open up the Default solution, navigate to processes, select the workflow, and then reactivate it:

Both methods work just fine, and as mentioned earlier on, I’ve since replicated this on workflows in other managed solutions.

To me, this is somewhat strange, and should work regardless. According to Siva, it’s the desired system behaviour, though I have no idea why someone should want it to work in one way, and not in another.

So if you’re reading this, and you might just happen to know someone in the necessary Microsoft engineering/development team who’d be able to answer this, could you point them my way? I’d love to engage them to find out why, how, and if they could pretty please change this?

Omnichannel Supervisor Tools

While I’ve covered a lot of different pieces of functionality from both the end customer & agent experience, I haven’t really touched on the Supervisor experience to date. With the release of a nice little piece of functionality for it around Sentiment Analysis, I’ve therefore decided that it would be a good time to take a look at it.

Now obviously supervisors exist, in the sense that any contact centre would have managers in place to manage the agents. Indeed, they may actually handle customer queries directly as well – miracles have been known to happen! 😉

Really the aim of the supervisor role within Omnichannel is intended to help customer service managers or supervisors enhance their team’s performance and improve customer satisfaction. They need to ensure that customer queries:

  • Are being responded to quickly within an accepted period of time
  • have agents that are providing the right information necessary to handle the query
  • Are handled in a satisfactory way
  • Leave the customer feeling positive & satisfied around the interaction

To this end, the supervisor role includes access to various dashboards & views on the sessions that are taking place. From this, they’re able to ensure that KPI’s are being met, that queues aren’t overflowing, and that agents are carrying out the right work.

Please note that PowerBI Pro or PowerBI Premium licenses are required for users with the Supervisor role in order to access & view these dashboards

On-going Conversation Dashboard

The on-going conversation dashboard is one of the first tools available to supervisors. In this, they can see the entire ‘landscape’ at one glance, covering:.

  • Which conversations are currently active
  • The queue that the conversation has come through
  • The channel that the conversation has come through
  • Which agent is currently handing the interaction
  • The sentiment of the customer experience (more on this below)

Through this, there’s a wealth of knowledge that the supervisor can use. If a conversation doesn’t appear to be going well, they can reach out to the agent who’s handling it, and ask if they need assistance. They can be ready to offer escalation resolution should it be needed.

Supervisors are also able to allocate any conversation that’s an in ‘Open’ state (ie it hasn’t yet started) to a specific agent, or to a specific queue.. They would do this by selecting the conversation in the window, clicking the Assign button (which appears when the conversation is selected), & selecting either Agent or Queue. Depending on which option is selected, they can then select the agent or queue that they wish to.

Furthermore, supervisors are also able to monitor any conversation that is happening (as long as it’s in the Active or Wrap Up stage). When doing this, the customer & the agent don’t know that the supervisor is monitoring the conversation (unless the agent requests it, of course). Through this, they can keep an eye on how things are going, and if they feel it’s necessary, they can join it (without needing to be invited to it). Of course when they join the conversation as an active party, the customer is then notified about it.

To do this, a supervisor would select the conversation (providing it is in the ‘Active’ or Wrap Up’ state) and then can click ‘Monitor’. This action triggers a new session for the supervisor to be pulled into the conversation.

Sentiment Analysis for Supervisors

So one of the really cool features (in my opinion) that’s recently appeared is the ability to use sentiment analysis to automatically alert supervisors.

You’re able to choose the level of sentiment that you want supervisors to be alerted on. When a conversation reaches the predefined level, the supervisor will get a prompt like this:

Sentiment analysis notification

They can then click through to either monitor the conversation (& help out if necessary), or to ignore it. This can be really helpful as it’s allowing the supervisor to be proactive, rather then needing to keep a close eye all the time on the supervisor dashboards. Indeed for a large contact centre, there could be dozens or even hundreds of conversations happening at the same time, so this will immediately flag these conversations to them.

Intraday Insights Dashboard

The Intraday Insights dashboard gives information around KPI’s that are in place for the company. This does need to be configured before supervisors are able to access it – I’d recommend looking at the extensive guide on how to do this at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/omnichannel/administrator/configure-intraday-dashboard-supervisor.

There are two sections that are included:

  • Conversations insights
  • Agent insights

Conversation Insights

This section gives supervisors insights into conversations that have occurred over the last 24 hours, against a range of KPI’s. This is therefore a ‘rolling state’ dashboard, without the ability to go back further over time, or pick a specific date-range. If this ability is needed, then the Agent Insights dashboard will be used.

Conversations insights dashboard

As you can see from the image above, we’re looking at metrics across different sorts of KPI’s:

  • Average wait times
  • Average handling times
  • Conversations exceeding specified criteria

This can be very helpful on an on-going basis to see how the contact centre is performing overall, over the time period. Drilling down into these items can help identify bottlenecks & choke points, which can then be worked on to provide better service & efficiencies.

Agent Insights

This part of the dashboard gives information across various health & status items on any given day. Using this, supervisors can drill down into issues that may not be visible through the conversation insights dashboard.

From the screen above, we can see that things like conversation states, agent status & participation modes are available to view.

Because these are PowerBI dashboards, it’s possible to drill down further into them, filter by item (eg queue, agent, etc), and see very specific stats about items.

I hope that this proves to be helpful in understanding some of the tools that are available within Omnichannel for supervisors, and the help that they can give in running an efficient and productive contact centre!

Updating User Settings with Power Automate

Here’s a scenario that could be all too familiar to us. We’re on-boarding users (to either Dynamics 365 or a Power Platform app), & they’re new to the environment that it’s deployed to. So they’re set up, and all ready to go. Suddenly they start asking why records created (or modified) by colleagues show up as having the wrong time on them.

Reverse Wall Clock Unusual Numbers Backwards Modern Decorative ...

Does this sound familiar? I’m sure it does to quite a few people out there!. See, there’s no way to set a default system-wide time zone in Dynamics 365 (or Power Platform). At least not that I’ve come across – if you know of one, please comment below with instructions as to how to do this!

As a result, users are given the default timezone, and need to change it. This is easily done through the Personalization settings area in the app. Users click here, and then select their appropriate time-zone. Brilliant…or so you’d think.

See, when it’s one or two users, it’s generally OK to tell them to do that. However, when it’s 200 or 2000 users, you’re going to get push-back. The last thing you want is for a large number of them to start contacting you to work out how to do it (read the instructions, perhaps?).

User queue stock photo © zam ri (OneO2) (#258450) | Stockfresh

I’ve had this scenario over the last week, where the client actually told us that they didn’t want us to tell users to update it manually. They wanted a better solution.

Well, there is a solution out there to update users. It’s the ‘User Settings Utility’ app that’s in the XrmToolBox (https://www.xrmtoolbox.com/plugins/MsCrmTools.UserSettingsUtility/). Really neat & nifty, and does just what it says on the box. Simple enough to select users (or all of them at a time), select the time-zone you’re wanting to apply to them, and click a button. Hey presto – it’s been updated

Hmm. But what if you didn’t want to have to do this manually. Or (and this is what I was dealing with), there were decent enough number of users being added to the app every few days, & I didn’t want to have to do this as a manual task.

So I started digging into how the time-zone setting was actually stored. It turns out that there’s an entity called ‘User Settings’, which is associated with a User record. Oh, and if you’re going to want to take a look at this entity to see what it contains, it’s NOT available through the front end. You can’t go into the entity list and just display it (though if you’ve found a way to do this through the Power Platform NATIVELY, drop me a line, please?).

Anyhow, back to things. There’s a value for ‘TimeZoneCode’, which maps to a specific time-zone. Aha, I thought! Right – now what’s the best way that I could work out to do this automatically. Checking in with some contacts in the tech community (thanks BlackOps etc!), Power Automate was suggested, so I started to see about how I could go about it…

So, I created a Power Automate Flow (haha…I got the name right there!). On creation of a new user record, it would programmatically go away and update the value to the one for the time-zone that I wanted it to be set as. This actually worked really well.

The only drawback is that through the user interface, it’s not actually shown as being updated, though it has been. Or sometimes it changes, but doesn’t reflect it accurately. This is somewhat annoying, and caused me quite some confusion between checking the front end to see if things were working, & confirming through the back end (& opening records up) to see that it was. I still have NO idea why this was happening.

Before changing my settings
After changing my time zone to USA (EST)

For my specific scenario, all of the users are in the UK, so I set it to update every user on creation to the UK time-zone. Obviously if you have users in different time-zones, you’d want to set this differently. This shouldn’t be an issue though, as you can expand the Power Automate Flow and add logic conditions/branches to be able to do this.

Now I think that this is pretty cool, and I couldn’t find anything out there for this. I’ve therefore decided to release this in a small solution, for others to be able to use. Part of this is the entire list of time-zones with their specific codes, so that you can update to whichever one you need to.

Update Timezone for New UsersDownload

I hope that this helps solve a small but annoying problem (at least it did for me). Please do provide feedback if you want to!

Omnichannel – Pre Survey Responses & Routing

I’d like to start off here by admitting that in a previous blog post that I put up, I mentioned that it’s not possible to route customers to different queues through the chat itself. That was wrong – thankfully several very nice people at Microsoft reached out to let me know how it’s done (thanks BTW for reading my blog!). I therefore thought it would make a good article, as people do ask me about this from time to time.

So, how exactly does Omnichannel facilitate this? Well, there are two parts:

  • Pre chat surveys
  • Routing rule items

Pre chat surveys

These surveys are really quick & easy to set up (or even more complicated, if you so desire). To start getting to grips with them, open a Live Chat record, and go to the ‘Pre-chat survey’ tab

Here, you’ll be able to set up your questions, which is done by clicking the ‘Add Question’ button. When you do this, you’ll get the following prompt.

So, three of the four questions are really quite simple. You need to give it a name (as every system record needs), the actual question text, and whether it’s mandatory or not. The fourth question ask you what sort of question type you’re looking for. The options available are:

  • Single line of text
  • Multiple lines of text
  • Option set
  • User consent

If you select ‘Option set’, you’ll be prompted to enter the values. These should be separated by a semi-colon character:

With our pre-chat survey questions being set up, let’s see how we go ahead and use them for routing.

Workstreams

If you go ahead and open up any workstream record, you’ll see several tabs available. Two of these tabs are Context Variables, and Routing Rule Items. There’s usually one workstream per chat channel, with setting options within it as required. Opening up the workstream for the Live Chat, we can see them there:

Let’s take a closer look at the Context Variables first. Going to this tab shows us the following:

Woah. Where did those entries come from? I didn’t enter anything here – though I can create context variables if I want to.

Well, remember those pre-chat survey questions that we created? Each time one of these is created, it creates a context variable record for the workstream that the chat is associated to. So each of my questions (and I have four of these) now have a corresponding entry.

OK – so the system does that. But how does that help me when looking at trying to route things?

Simply put, these are the building blocks that we’ll set up in the Routing Rule Items to flow the customer chat through to an appropriate location. Let’s go and create one to see what happens.

We need to set the queue that this rule to apply to. Then we’ll go ahead and set the condition/s that we’re wanting to apply for this queue. There are several different possibilities to start with:

Selecting the entity that we want to use for the rule will then allow us to pick an attribute for that entity. So;

  • Account, Contact, Case & Live Chat Context will give an option to select one of the attributes from the entity
  • Context Variables will give the available context variables to choose from

You’ll then be prompted to select an Operator. These will vary depending on the type of field (eg a number field will have additional options such as Greater Than, Smaller Than, etc)

Finally, you’ll enter the value that you’re looking to match with for the condition. This is free text (it’s not auto-populated with values). So in summary, you’ll have something like the following:

And tadaa! it’s active. Brilliant!

We’re able to stack up multiple conditions to cover specific scenarios. An example could the following:

  • Customer has a Kawasaki motorbike (not a different make)
  • Customer’s annual spend falls into the ‘high spend’ bracket

There are plenty of other scenarios that can be covered, and the conditions allow this to cover quite complex situations.

So, some things to note around workstreams & routing rule items:

  • You can have multiple routing rule items per workstream, each one routing to a different queue. These are evaluated in the order that they’re saved in. Eg if there are 4 rules, an incoming chat will be evaluated against rule 1, then rule 2, etc
  • When a routing rule condition is met, the chat gets routed to the destination. No other evaluation against the remainder of the rules is carried out

I hope that this has come in useful, and put some interesting thoughts into your mind as to how you could implement this at your organisation or clients!